Distributed code tracing system

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are various embodiments for a distributed code tracing system that provides code tracing as a service in a multi-tenant computing environment. In one embodiment, a code trace is received that is associated with a request submitted to a particular application hosted in a computing environment, where multiple applications are hosted in the computing environment. The code trace documents calls to multiple component services of the particular application in order to respond to the request. The code trace is then stored in a data store that is indexed by a unique identifier of the request.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to,co-pending U.S. patent application entitled “DISTRIBUTED CODE TRACINGSYSTEM,” filed on Dec. 14, 2016, and assigned application Ser. No.15/378,367, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application62/426,588, entitled “DISTRIBUTED CODE TRACING SYSTEM,” and filed onNov. 27, 2016, which are incorporated herein by reference in theirentireties.

BACKGROUND

A service-oriented architecture is a software design paradigm in whichapplication components provide services to other application componentsthrough a communication protocol. By using an abstraction similar tothat of object oriented programming, services can be deployed onmultiple computing devices and in multiple locations, which allows forscaling and flexibility. Microservices are a particular approach toservice-oriented architecture with a small granularity. Under amicroservices approach, a single request for a web page might be handledby dozens of different services that are each specialized to perform aspecific task.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood withreference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings arenot necessarily to scale, with emphasis instead being placed uponclearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Moreover, in thedrawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding partsthroughout the several views.

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a networked environment accordingto various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 2 and 3 are schematic block diagrams of a computing environmentused in the networked environment of FIG. 1 according to variousembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a data store used in thenetworked environment of FIG. 1 according to various embodiments of thepresent disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a computing environment used inthe networked environment of FIG. 1 according to various embodiments ofthe present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a trace processing entity executed in acomputing environment in the networked environment of FIG. 1 accordingto various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a trace indexing service executed in acomputing environment in the networked environment of FIG. 1 accordingto various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a sampling service executed in a computingenvironment in the networked environment of FIG. 1 according to variousembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a control entity of a trace processing systemexecuted in a computing environment in the networked environment of FIG.1 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a trace processing system executed in acomputing environment in the networked environment of FIG. 1 accordingto various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating one example of functionalityimplemented as portions of a load balancer executed in a computingenvironment in the networked environment of FIG. 1 according to variousembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram that provides one exampleillustration of a computing environment employed in the networkedenvironment of FIG. 1 according to various embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure relates to providing code tracing as a service.Service-oriented architectures, and particularly those involvingmicroservices, can be extremely difficult to debug. As a single requestto generate a web page may result in dozens of different microservicecalls, a failure or software defect in any one of the microservices mayresult in a failure or error in generating the web page. For example, acustomer request to add an item to an electronic shopping cart mayresult in a call to a first service to identify the customer, a call toa second service to verify the price of the item, a call to a thirdservice to verify a shipping address, a call to a fourth service toconfirm warehouse availability of the item, and so forth. Any of thesedependent services may exhibit defects or may not be operating properly.

In searching out software defects or performing an operationalassessment, code traces are often helpful. For instance, code traces canassist in identifying performance bottlenecks, edge case errors, andother hard-to-detect issues. A code trace can identify which servicesare invoked by a particular service, along with associated metadata suchas parameters, timestamps, results, and so on. With microservices, codetraces can become extremely lengthy and complex, and tracing itself canintroduce a significant resource overhead.

Various embodiments of the present disclosure introduce an architecturefor providing code tracing as a service, specifically within hosted,multi-tenant computing environments. Web services and otherservice-based applications may be hosted by a third-party computingresource provider under a utility computing model. Such a hostedenvironment offers many advantages, including resource elasticity orscaling, distribution across a network for increased availability andfault tolerance, and abstraction of the underlying hardware and/oroperating systems.

As will be described, a tracing architecture can be deployed by thecomputing resource provider to collect and store code traces formultiple resource customers. The code traces may be indexed and madesearchable. Also, graphical user interfaces may be generated fromanalyses of the traces to visualize operational aspects of the resourcecustomers' services. In this way, resource customers can simply includea tracing application programming interface (API) in their software codeto enable tracing, without having to install tracing software or worryabout backend concerns such as scalability.

In some embodiments, the tracing architecture may include samplingfunctionality to reduce the traces that are collected. While it may befeasible to collect all traces for a lower volume resource customer, itmay not be cost effective to collect all traces for an extremely highvolume resource customer. Thus, sampling may be employed to collect andstore a representative quantity of traces, either periodically or inresponse to events. As will be described, the sampling architecture mayemploy a hybrid of Bernoulli sampling and reservoir sampling. Variablesampling rates can be established for different routes in a distributedsystem based, for example, on uniform resource locator (URL), domainname, and/or path. In the following discussion, a general description ofthe system and its components is provided, followed by a discussion ofthe operation of the same.

With reference to FIG. 1 , shown is a networked environment 100according to various embodiments. The networked environment 100 includesa computing environment 103 and one or more client devices 106, whichare in data communication with each other via a network 109. The network109 includes, for example, the Internet, intranets, extranets, wide areanetworks (WANs), local area networks (LANs), wired networks, wirelessnetworks, cable networks, satellite networks, or other suitablenetworks, etc., or any combination of two or more such networks.

The computing environment 103 may comprise, for example, a servercomputer or any other system providing computing capability.Alternatively, the computing environment 103 may employ a plurality ofcomputing devices that may be arranged, for example, in one or moreserver banks or computer banks or other arrangements. Such computingdevices may be located in a single installation or may be distributedamong many different geographical locations. For example, the computingenvironment 103 may include a plurality of computing devices thattogether may comprise a hosted computing resource, a grid computingresource, and/or any other distributed computing arrangement. In somecases, the computing environment 103 may correspond to an elasticcomputing resource where the allotted capacity of processing, network,storage, or other computing-related resources may vary over time. Inparticular, the computing environment 103 may be operated by a hostingprovider under a multi-tenant utility computing model, such thatcomputing capacity in the computing environment 103 is provided tomultiple customers on a metered basis.

Various applications and/or other functionality may be executed in thecomputing environment 103 according to various embodiments. Also,various data is stored in a data store 112 that is accessible to thecomputing environment 103. The data store 112 may be representative of aplurality of data stores 112 as can be appreciated. The data stored inthe data store 112, for example, is associated with the operation of thevarious applications and/or functional entities described below. Forexample, the data store 112 may comprise a key-value data store (e.g., aNoSQL data store), a relational database management system (RDBMS), oranother type of data store.

The components executed on the computing environment 103, for example,include applications 115, a storage service 118, a code executionservice 121, a queue service 124, a trace processing system 127, andother services, processes, systems, engines, or functionality notdiscussed in detail herein. The applications 115 correspond tocustomer-owned applications that are hosted by the computing environment103. The applications 115 may be web-based applications or web servicesthat use hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), simple object accessprotocol (SOAP), representational state transfer (REST), and/or relatedtechnologies. The applications 115 may be relatively simple orrelatively complex, potentially being made up of a plurality of userservices 130 a, 130 b . . . 130N that are referred to as componentservices of the respective application 115. A user service 130 mayinvoke other user services 130, other services in the computingenvironment 103, or external services outside of the computingenvironment 103. Also, the applications 115 may vary in their amount ofincoming traffic: some applications 115 may be extremely popular, whileothers are seldom invoked.

An application 115 may be configured to process one or more types ofrequests 133 submitted by client devices 106 via the network 109. Thedifferent types of requests 133 may be distinguished by their uniformresource locator (URL), domain name, path name, or other identifier. Forexample, the application 115 may generate one or more web pages, datafor mobile applications, and/or other forms of network content as aresult. The result is returned by the application 115 to the clientdevice 106 via the network 109 for rendering by the client device 106.In some cases, an application 115 may be invoked programmatically byanother application 115 executing on another server.

The storage service 118 facilitates access to data stored by the datastore 112. For example, the storage service 118 may facilitate storingdata, deleting data, overwriting data, or other functions. The storageservice 118 may track utilization metrics for billing purposes, wherethe utilization may be tracked in terms of quantity of data stored,quantity of data transferred, and/or quantity of requests. The storageservice 118 may provide varying levels of service at varying levels ofcost. For example, the storage service 118 may provide eventuallyconsistent data storage at a lower cost than consistent data storage.Also, the storage service 118 may provide cold storage services whereretrieval operations are more costly than storage operations.

A code execution service 121 receives code uploaded by customers andexecutes the code to perform a function, such as providing computationsfor a user service 130. A queue service 124 enables temporary storage topass messages among user services 130 and applications 115. Usage of thecode execution service 121 and the queue service 124 may be metered andbilled to the customer.

The trace processing system 127, as will be described in detail,provides optional code trace capturing and analysis for applications 115and user services 130 hosted in the computing environment 103. Inaddition, the trace processing system 127 may monitor operationsperformed by offered services, such as the storage service 118, codeexecution service 121, and queue service 124, among others.

Use of the trace processing system 127 may also be monitored and billedbased on resource consumption as indicated by quantities of traces thatare sampled and/or quantities of traces processed during analysis. It isnoted that the trace processing system 127, like the storage service,the code execution service 121, and the queue service 124, can be madeavailable to multiple customers of the hosting provider. To providetracing data, the code of the applications 115 and user services 130 maysimply call a tracing application programming interface (API) that islinked to the trace processing system 127.

The client device 106 is representative of a plurality of client devicesthat may be coupled to the network 109. The client device 106 maycomprise, for example, a processor-based system, such as a computersystem. Such a computer system may be embodied in the form of a desktopcomputer, a laptop computer, personal digital assistants, cellulartelephones, smartphones, set-top boxes, music players, web pads, tabletcomputer systems, game consoles, electronic book readers, smartwatches,head mounted displays, voice interface devices, or other devices. Theclient device 106 may include a display 136. The display 136 maycomprise, for example, one or more devices such as liquid crystaldisplay (LCD) displays, gas plasma-based flat panel displays, organiclight emitting diode (OLED) displays, electrophoretic ink (E ink)displays, LCD projectors, or other types of display devices, etc.

The client device 106 may be configured to execute various applicationssuch as a client application 139 and/or other applications. The clientapplication 139 may be executed in a client device 106, for example, toaccess network content served up by the computing environment 103 and/orother servers, thereby rendering a user interface 142 on the display136. To this end, the client application 139 may comprise, for example,a browser, a dedicated application, etc., and the user interface 142 maycomprise a web page, an application screen, etc.

Turning now to FIG. 2 , shown is an alternative view of the computingenvironment 103 (FIG. 1 ) according to various embodiments. Inparticular, the computing environment 103 of FIG. 2 provides a componentview of the trace processing system 127 that is in communication withmultiple user services 130, which may be operated by multiple customersof the hosting provider. As a user service 130 reports portions of codetraces, those portions are first received by a load balancer 203 thatdistributes the code traces for processing approximately evenly across aplurality of trace processing entities 206 a, 206 b . . . 206N.

The trace processing entities 206 apply time-based compression tocompress traces received within a particular time window. The compressedtraces are then stored upon expiration of the particular time window bythe storage service 118. In one embodiment, the compressed traces arestored in a key-value store, with the key being the unique identifier ofthe trace and the data being the binary compressed data of the trace.

The trace processing system 127 may also include a trace indexingservice 207, a trace analysis service 209, a control entity 212, amongother components. The trace indexing service 207 is executedperiodically to retrieve recently stored traces from the storage service118 and to perform indexing functionality. This indexing functionalitymay be performed asynchronously with respect to the storage of thetraces by the trace processing entities 206. The trace analysis service209 may be executed to generate metrics and/or relationships gleanedthrough an analysis of the stored and indexed traces. The control entity212 may be executed to generate dashboard and/or control user interfaces142 as well as perform automatic scaling and/or other managementfunctions for the trace processing system 127.

Moving on to FIG. 3 , shown is an alternative view of the computingenvironment 103 (FIG. 2 ) according to embodiments that support tracesampling. Rather than forwarding trace segments directly to the loadbalancer 203 as in FIG. 2 , in the embodiments of FIG. 3 , the userservices 130 forward traces to sampling services 303 a, 303 b . . .303N. The sampling services 303 apply sampling parameters to forward aconfigurable fraction of the code traces to the trace processing system127 for further processing. The result can be characterized as a blendof reservoir sampling, where up to a fixed target of traces arecollected, with Bernoulli sampling, where a percentage of additionaltraces are sampled. The sampling services 303 can be deployed in thecomputing environment 103 to be relatively “close” to the user services130. For example, a sampling service 303 may be executed on the samemachine instance as the user service 130 in order to reduce networktraffic.

The sampling services 303 regularly report sampling metrics to thecontrol entity 212 of the trace processing system 127. In turn, thecontrol entity 212 may send directives to the sampling services 303 toadjust sampling parameters to increase or decrease sampling of traces.The sampling parameters may be dynamically adjusted in order to containcosts within a specified budget, to take advantage of lower costs, torespond to changes in request traffic, and/or for other reasons.

In some cases, a hierarchy or tier of sampling services 303 may beemployed. As shown in FIG. 3 , sampling services 303 a and 303 b forwardtraces to a sampling service 303 c, which can perform further samplingas needed. Also, sampling rates may be adjusted on a per-service basisand/or on a per-request type basis. For example, different actions orrequest types may have different sampling parameters. In one embodiment,a first tier of sampling services 303 (e.g., sampling services 303 a and303 b) may perform a coarse-grained, imprecise sampling, while a secondtier of sampling services (e.g. the sampling service 303 c) may performa fine-grained, more precise sampling.

Continuing to FIG. 4 , shown is one example of a data store 112 (FIG. 1) according to various embodiments. Among the various data stored in thedata store 112 are code traces 403, trace indices 406, service maps 409,sampling parameters 412, sampling metrics 415, tracing cost data 418,customer parameters 421, dictionaries 424, a tracing softwaredevelopment kit (SDK) 426 providing a tracing API 427, and/or otherdata.

The code traces 403 correspond to traces of calls between variouscomponent services of an application 115 (FIG. 1 ) in response to aparticular request 133 (FIG. 1 ). That is to say, a single request 133that may originate from a client device 106 (FIG. 1 ) can cause asequence of service calls to be invoked to the user services 130 (FIG. 1). The user services 130 can then call other user services 130, otherservices within the computing environment 103, and external services.Information about these various calls are stored as a code trace 403 insegments 433 and subsegments 436. A segment 433 may be a portion of acode trace 403 associated with a specific time period and may becomposed of one or more subsegments 436.

A subsegment 436 can describe a particular call and containscorresponding data 439. All subsegments 436 in a code trace 403 areassociated with a single unique identifier 442, which uniquelyidentifies the particular request 133 corresponding to the code tracesubsegment 436. The data 439 can include, for example, a resource URL,error indicators, response times, identification of a calling service,identification of a called service, an HTTP user agent, a client networkaddress, results returned, and/or other data.

The code traces 403 may be stored in a compressed format, such that adictionary 424 is necessary to decode them. It is noted that a codetrace 403 may be updated over a relatively long time frame, e.g., up toa week. In such cases, a code trace 403 may be updated to incorporateadditional segments 433 and subsegments 436. This may involve deletingthe previously stored code traces 403 and/or recompressing thepreviously stored code traces 403 with the additional segments 433 andsubsegments 436 being incorporated.

Also, the code traces 403 may include local execution information abouta user service 130 for debugging purposes. For example, a code trace 403may report time to parse a file, time to perform a computation, and/orother local runtime information.

The trace indices 406 provide searchable indices for the code traces 403based on various attributes, such as a domain name of a called service,a request type, a client network address, and/or other attributes. Thetrace indices 406 may be generated periodically and asynchronously withrespect to the storage of the code traces 403.

The service maps 409 correspond to data for user interfaces 142 (FIG. 1) that are generated by the trace analysis service 209 (FIG. 2 ). Forexample, a service map 409 may include a visual representation of theplurality of calls to the plurality of component services of theparticular application 115 across a plurality of requests 133 receivedby the particular application 115. Another example type of userinterface 142 may include latency histograms 445 that indicate responsetime or latency for different user services 130 and/or different requesttypes as analyzed by the trace analysis service 209 across multiple codetraces 403.

The sampling parameters 412 correspond to parameters that controlsampling of code traces 403 by the sampling services 303. The samplingparameters 412 may specify a fixed number and/or a proportion orpercentage of code traces 403 (or segments 433 or subsegments 436thereof) to be forwarded or dropped during a specified time period. Forexample, the sampling parameters 412 may specify that twenty percent ofall code trace segments 433 received in a five-second period should beforwarded. Different sampling parameters 412 may be applied fordifferent request types and/or user services 130, and the samplingparameters 412 may be dynamically updated under control of the controlentity 212 (FIG. 2 ).

The sampling metrics 415 report metrics regarding which and/or how manycode trace segments 433 were forwarded and/or discarded during a sampletime period. For example, the sampling metrics 415 may indicate that nocode trace segments 433 were received, and therefore none were forwardedor dropped. The volume of requests and how they are handled are reportedas these sampling metrics 415 to the control entity 212, which maychoose to adjust the sampling parameters 412 in view of the samplingmetrics 415.

The tracing cost data 418 may indicate a current cost associated withprocessing code traces 403 by the tracing processing system 127.Different costs may be associated with storing code traces 403 oraccessing code traces 403 (e.g., as part of a search query or foranalysis performed by the trace analysis service 209). These costs maychange over time. The fluctuations may depend on prices of underlyingcomputer resources in the computing environment 103, which may fluctuatebased upon demand and availability.

The customer parameters 421 control the operation of the tracingprocessing system 127 for a given customer. For example, a customer mayelect to turn tracing collection on or off, or to adjust sampling ratesfor particular services or request types. A customer may also specify atarget cost for tracing, with maximum and/or minimum thresholds for thetarget.

The dictionaries 424 are used to perform time-based compression of codetraces 403. For a given code trace 403, there may be a great deal ofrepetition of text, such as domain names, URLs, network addresses, andso forth. A dictionary 424 is generated so that repetitious text can bereplaced with a binary symbol, thereby effecting data compression. Thedictionary 424 may be regenerated over a time window. The time windowfor regenerating a dictionary 424 may be greater than a time window forwhich segments 433 of a code trace 403 are aggregated for storage.

The tracing SDK 426 comprises code that when included in the application115 or user services 130 of the customer, enables tracing of calls usingthe tracing API 427. Although use of the tracing API 427 may be aprerequisite for tracing, it is noted that tracing collection andprocessing may be turned on or off or sampled dynamically even if thetracing API 427 is used by code of a customer.

Referring next to FIG. 5 , shown is one example of a computingenvironment 103 according to various embodiments. The computingenvironment 103 includes a plurality of computing devices 503 a, 503 b .. . 503 n, a plurality of computing devices 506 a, 506 b . . . 506 n,and a data store 509. Such components of the computing environment 103may be in data communication with each other and/or external computingdevices by way of a network. Such computing devices 503 and 506 may belocated in a single installation or may be dispersed among manydifferent geographical locations.

Computing devices 503 and 506 may correspond to differing hardwareplatforms in various embodiments. Accordingly, computing devices 503 and506 may have differing hardware configurations, for example, of centralprocessing units (CPUs), system memory, data storage, network bandwidth,and/or other hardware characteristics. In one embodiment, all computingdevices 503 a, 503 b . . . 503 n may have a first hardwareconfiguration, while all computing devices 506 a, 506 b . . . 506 n mayhave a second hardware configuration. Although only two sets ofcomputing devices 503 and 506 are shown, it is understood that there maybe any number of sets of computing devices 503 and 506 having differenthardware configurations.

Each computing device 503, 506 may execute one or more machine instances(MI). A machine instance may correspond to an actual machine or to avirtual machine. A virtual machine instance is a virtualized computersystem, or a software implementation of a physical computing system.Virtual machines may provide for multiple and/or different operatingsystem environments to run concurrently on a single system having aprocessor circuit and a memory. As a non-limiting example, multipleinstances of a Linux® operating system environment may executeconcurrently with multiple instances of a Microsoft® Windows® operatingsystem environment on a single system. Each machine instance may becontrolled by different customers, who may have administrative accessonly to their own instance(s) and no access to the instances of othercustomers. Multiple machine instances may in fact execute concurrentlyon a computer system including parallel processors, although multipleinstances may appear to execute concurrently on a multithreaded computersystem with fewer processors than instances.

Different types of machine instances may be available. In the example ofFIG. 5 , computing devices 503 may support three types of machineinstances: MI large 512, MI medium 515, and MI small 518, each of whichmay be associated with differing resource configurations. As anon-limiting example, each MI large 512 instance may have fourCPU-equivalent units, 15 GB of system memory, and 1,000 GB of datastorage. Each MI medium 515 instance may have two CPU-equivalent units,10 GB of system memory, and 500 GB of data storage. Also, each MI small518 instance may have one CPU-equivalent unit, 5 GB of system memory,and 550 GB of data storage. In the example of FIG. 5 , computing devices506 may also support three types of machine instances, namely, MI large521, MI medium 524, and MI small 527. MI large 521, MI medium 524, andMI small 527 may have the same respective configurations as MI large512, MI medium 515, and MI small 518 or may have differentconfigurations as desired. As a non-limiting example, a MI large 521instance may have four CPU-equivalent units, 50 GB of system memory, and1,000 GB of data storage.

The example of three types of machine instances for each type ofcomputing device 503, 506 is not intended to be limiting. In variousembodiments, there may be more or fewer types of machine instances foreach type of computing device 503, 506. In one embodiment, a machineinstance may comprise an allocation of an entire computing device 503,506 with no virtualization.

In the example of FIG. 5 , one MI large 512 instance is executing oncomputing device 503 a, two MI medium 515 a, 515 b instances areexecuting on computing device 503 b, one MI medium 515 c instance andtwo MI small 518 a, 518 b instances are executing on computing device503 n, one MI large 521 instance is executing on computing device 506 a,three MI medium 524 a, 524 b, 524 c instances are executing on computingdevice 506 b, and one MI medium 524 d instance and four MI small 527 a,527 b, 527 c, 527 d instances are executing on computing device 506 n.Each machine instance may be associated with a customer, though anycustomer may be associated with any number of machine instances.

In various embodiments, a customer may be capable of launching newmachine instances and/or terminating machine instances dynamically.Thus, the computing environment 103 may provide elastic computingcapability to the customer that can vary over time. As a non-limitingexample, a customer hosting an infrequently visited network site on amachine instance may suddenly get an influx of network page hits whenthe network site is mentioned on television or linked on a popularnetwork site. The increase in network site traffic may overwhelm thecomputing capability of the machine instance, leading to poor networksite performance and availability. To cope with the network sitetraffic, the customer may launch new machine instances and/or transitionto a machine instance with more resources and better performance.

Various applications and/or other functionality may be executed in themachine instances and in the computing devices 503, 506 according tovarious embodiments. Also, various data is stored in a data store 509that is accessible to the computing devices 503, 506. The data store 509may be representative of a plurality of data stores 509 as can beappreciated. The data stored in the data store 509 includes, forexample, machine image data 530, customer data 533, and potentiallyother data.

Machine image data 530 may include data used to launch a machineinstance. Machine image data 530 may include one or more disk images ofan operating system environment. Some of the disk images may bepreconfigured for use by any customer or subset of customers, whileothers may be customized for a particular customer or subset ofcustomers. In one embodiment, one disk image may be loaded by multiplemachine instances.

The customer data 533 may include customer-specific data. In oneembodiment, all customer configuration data for a machine instance isstored in customer data 533. In this way, such data may be easily sharedamong many machine instances. As a non-limiting example, the customerdata 533 may include network pages to be served up by one or morenetwork page servers executing on machine instances associated with acustomer. However, it is understood that in some embodimentscustomer-specific data may be stored within local data storageassociated with a machine instance.

Referring next to FIG. 6 , shown is a flowchart that provides oneexample of the operation of a portion of the trace processing entity 206(FIG. 2 ) according to various embodiments. It is understood that theflowchart of FIG. 6 provides merely an example of the many differenttypes of functional arrangements that may be employed to implement theoperation of the portion of the trace processing entity 206 as describedherein. As an alternative, the flowchart of FIG. 6 may be viewed asdepicting an example of elements of a method implemented in thecomputing environment 103 (FIG. 1 ) according to one or moreembodiments.

Beginning with box 603, the trace processing entity 206 determineswhether to regenerate a dictionary 424 (FIG. 4 ) based at least in parton an expiration of a time window. The trace processing entity 206 mayperiodically regenerate the dictionary 424 in order to effectivelycompress code traces 403 (FIG. 2 ), which are more likely to resembleeach other within a given period of time.

If the dictionary 424 is to be regenerated, the trace processing entity206 moves to box 606 and generates an updated dictionary 424. In doingso, the trace processing entity 206 may examine code traces 403 receivedwithin a time window and determine frequently occurring strings orsubstrings. These frequently occurring strings or substrings can beassigned relatively short binary symbols, thereby compressing the lengthof the code trace 403. The trace processing entity 206 continues to box609. If the dictionary 424 is not to be regenerated, the traceprocessing entity 206 continues to box 609.

In box 609, the trace processing entity 206 receives segments 433 (FIG.4 ) of code traces 403. The trace processing entity 206 then aggregatesthe code trace segments 433 received within a time window in box 612.The segments 433 are stored temporarily in a volatile memory rather thana persistent memory for speed. It is noted that the time window forregenerating the dictionary 424 may be longer than the time window foraggregating code trace segments 433. In box 615, the trace processingentity 206 compresses the aggregated code trace segments 433 usingtime-based compression with the dictionary 424.

In box 618, the trace processing entity 206 stores the compressed codetrace segments 433 in the data store 112 (FIG. 4 ) via the storageservice 118 (FIG. 2 ). For example, the code trace segments 433 may bestored using a key of the unique identifier 442 (FIG. 2 ) with the valuebeing the compressed binary data. Thereafter, the operation of the traceprocessing entity 206 may return to box 603 and again determine whetherto regenerate the dictionary 424.

Turning now to FIG. 7 , shown is a flowchart that provides one exampleof the operation of a portion of the trace indexing service 207according to various embodiments. It is understood that the flowchart ofFIG. 7 provides merely an example of the many different types offunctional arrangements that may be employed to implement the operationof the portion of the trace indexing service 207 as described herein. Asan alternative, the flowchart of FIG. 7 may be viewed as depicting anexample of elements of a method implemented in the computing environment103 (FIG. 2 ) according to one or more embodiments.

Beginning with box 703, the trace indexing service 207 receives tracesegments 433 (FIG. 4 ) from the data store 112 (FIG. 4 ) that have beenmodified since the last indexing operation was performed. For example,the storage service 118 (FIG. 2 ) may support a “diff” operation thatprovides all of the data added since a previous point in time. In box706, the trace indexing service 207 decompresses the segments 433 usingcorresponding dictionaries 424 (FIG. 4 ).

In box 709, the trace indexing service 207 determines a plurality ofattributes for the code traces 403 (FIG. 4 ) from the data 439 (FIG. 4). In box 712, the trace indexing service 207 adds the code traces 403to one or more of the trace indices 406 (FIG. 4 ) that are searchable bythe attributes. Thereafter, the operation of the trace indexing service207 returns to box 703. It is noted that the indexing process performedby the trace indexing service 207 is performed asynchronously withrespect to the storage of the code traces 403 by the trace processingentities 206 (FIG. 2 ). The indexing may be performed periodically at alonger time window than for aggregating and storing the code traces 403.

Continuing to FIG. 8 , shown is a flowchart that provides one example ofthe operation of a portion of the sampling service 303 according tovarious embodiments. It is understood that the flowchart of FIG. 8provides merely an example of the many different types of functionalarrangements that may be employed to implement the operation of theportion of the sampling service 303 as described herein. As analternative, the flowchart of FIG. 8 may be viewed as depicting anexample of elements of a method implemented in the computing environment103 (FIG. 3 ) according to one or more embodiments.

Beginning with box 803, the sampling service 303 receives one or moresampling parameters 412 (FIG. 4 ) that control the sampling of codetraces 403 (FIG. 4 ) processed by the sampling service 303. In box 806,the sampling service 303 receives a segment 433 (FIG. 4 ) of a codetrace 403. In box 809, the sampling service 303 determines a type ofrequest 133 (FIG. 1 ) associated with the segment 433. For instance, thetype may be determined based upon a URL, a domain name, a path, anaction, or other parameter indicating the type of request 133. In box812, the sampling service 303 identifies one or more of the samplingparameters 412 that pertain to the type of request 133. In box 813, thesampling service 303 applies reservoir sampling based at least in parton the sampling parameter(s) 412 to collect a fixed number of codetraces 403 for a time period. For instance, if a sampling parameter 412specifies that fifty traces should be collected per second and then onehundred traces are received in a second, the first fifty traces will becollected. In box 815, the sampling service 303 applies Bernoullisampling based at least in part on the sampling parameter(s) 412 tosample a percentage of the additional code trace segments 433 receivedduring a time window. For instance, if a sampling parameter 412specifies a ten percent sampling rate, five additional traces beyond thefifty traces collected via reservoir sampling will be collected viaBernoulli sampling out of the one hundred traces in a second.

In box 818, the sampling service 303 determines whether to discard thesegment 433 or to forward the segment 433 for further processing. If thesampling service 303 determines to discard the segment 433, the samplingservice 303 discards the segment 433 in box 821 and then returns to box806 where an additional code trace segment 433 is received. If instead,the sampling service 303 determines to forward the segment 433, thesampling service 303 continues to box 824.

In box 824, the sampling service 303 adds the segment 433 to a batch ofsegments 433. In box 827, the sampling service 303 determines whether atime window has expired. If a time window has not expired, the samplingservice 303 returns to box 806 and receives another code trace segment433. Otherwise, the sampling service 303 continues to box 830.

In box 830, the sampling service 303 sends the batch of segments 433 tothe trace processing system 127 (FIG. 3 ). In box 833, the samplingservice 303 reports one or more sampling metrics 415 (FIG. 4 ) to thetrace processing system 127. These sampling metrics 415 may includeinformation about the number of code traces 403 or segments 433processed, forwarded, discarded, and so forth. In box 836, the samplingservice 303 receives a directive from the trace processing system 127 todynamically adjust the sampling for one or more request types.

In box 839, the sampling service 303 dynamically adjusts one or moresampling parameters 412 to modify the sampling in response to thedirective. In one use case, the sampling service 303 may dynamicallyincrease traces forwarded (as a proportion) when fewer traces arereceived, or may dynamically decrease traces forwarded (as a proportion)when more traces are received. Thereafter, the sampling service 303 mayreturn to box 806 and receive an additional code trace segment 433.

Referring next to FIG. 9 , shown is a flowchart that provides oneexample of the operation of a portion of the control entity 212 (FIG. 3) according to various embodiments. It is understood that the flowchartof FIG. 9 provides merely an example of the many different types offunctional arrangements that may be employed to implement the operationof the portion of the control entity 212 as described herein. As analternative, the flowchart of FIG. 9 may be viewed as depicting anexample of elements of a method implemented in the computing environment103 (FIG. 1 ) according to one or more embodiments.

Beginning with box 903, the control entity 212 determines a customertarget cost and/or other customer specified parameters. For example, acustomer may specify whether sampling is enabled or disabled, orspecific sampling percentages for various services and/or request types.In box 906, the control entity 212 determines a current cost associatedwith sampling (e.g., collecting code traces) from the tracing cost data418 (FIG. 4 ). In box 909, the control entity 212 determines samplingtargets (e.g., a target number of traces to collect for a given timeperiod) for individual ones of the sampling services 303 (FIG. 3 ). Forexample, the control entity 212 may be configured to limit sampling to atarget cost based on a current cost and a number of sampled code traces403 (FIG. 4 ).

In box 912, the control entity 212 receives sampling metrics 415 (FIG. 4) from individual ones of the sampling services 303. For example, thecontrol entity 212 may receive information indicating a number of codetraces 403 or segments 433 received in a time period. In box 915, thecontrol entity 212 compares the sampling metrics 415 with the samplingtargets (e.g., a target number of traces to collect).

In box 918, the control entity 212 determines whether to adjust thesampling. If sampling is not to be adjusted, the control entity 212returns to box 906 and reassesses the current cost. Otherwise, thecontrol entity 212 moves to box 921 and sends directives to one or moresampling services 303 to dynamically adjust one or more of the samplingparameters 412 (FIG. 4 ). Thereafter, the control entity 212 returns tobox 906 and reassesses the current cost.

Moving now to FIG. 10 , shown is a flowchart that provides one exampleof the operation of a portion of the trace processing system 127according to various embodiments. It is understood that the flowchart ofFIG. 10 provides merely an example of the many different types offunctional arrangements that may be employed to implement the operationof the portion of the trace processing system 127 as described herein.As an alternative, the flowchart of FIG. 10 may be viewed as depictingan example of elements of a method implemented in the computingenvironment 103 (FIG. 1 ) according to one or more embodiments.

Beginning with box 1003, the trace processing system 127 receivessampling parameters 412 (FIG. 4 ) from a customer, which can enable ordisable trace collection. In box 1006, the trace processing system 127generates a user interface 142 (FIG. 1 ) that indicates sampling metrics415 (FIG. 4 ) such as code traces 403 that are discarded and code traces403 that are forwarded for collection for various request types.

In box 1009, the trace processing system 127 generates a user interface142 indicating costs with tracing, including collection of traces and/oranalysis of traces. These costs may be broken down by user service 130(FIG. 1 ), application 115 (FIG. 1 ), request type, time period, orother factors.

In box 1012, the trace processing system 127 generates a user interface142 including a visual representation of calls to component services ofapplications 115, or a service map 409 (FIG. 4 ). In box 1015, the traceprocessing system 127 generates a user interface 142 that includes alatency histogram 445 (FIG. 4 ) indicating respective latenciesassociated with request types, services, or applications. Data for theuser interfaces 142 may be generated via the trace analysis service 209(FIG. 2 ) to access trace data and perform analyses. Thereafter, theoperation of the portion of the trace processing system 127 ends.

Referring next to FIG. 11 , shown is a flowchart that provides oneexample of the operation of a portion of the load balancer 203 (FIG. 2 )according to various embodiments. It is understood that the flowchart ofFIG. 11 provides merely an example of the many different types offunctional arrangements that may be employed to implement the operationof the portion of the load balancer 203 as described herein. As analternative, the flowchart of FIG. 11 may be viewed as depicting anexample of elements of a method implemented in the computing environment103 (FIG. 2 ) according to one or more embodiments.

Beginning with box 1103, the load balancer 203 receives a trace segment433 (FIG. 4 ) from a sampling service 303 (FIG. 3 ) or a daemonexecuting on the same machine instance as the user service 130 (FIG. 2). In box 1106, the load balancer 203 determines a unique identifier 442(FIG. 4 ) of a request 133 (FIG. 1 ) associated with the trace segment433.

In box 1109, the load balancer 203 selects a trace processing entity 206(FIG. 2 ) out of a plurality of trace processing entities 206 based atleast in part on applying a hashing function to the unique identifier442. The hashing function should evenly distribute the uniqueidentifiers 442 among the trace processing entities 206 to balance theload. In box 1112, the load balancer 203 forwards the trace segment 433to the trace processing entity 206.

In box 1115, the load balancer 203 determines a current resource load ofthe trace processing entities 206 (e.g., processor usage, memory usage,numbers of traces processed, etc.). In box 1118, the load balancer 203compares the current load to a threshold, which could be a minimumthreshold or a maximum threshold. In box 1121, the load balancer 203causes the quantity of trace processing entities 206 to be automaticallyscaled up or down depending on whether the load is too low or too high.Thus, if the load exceeds a maximum threshold, the number of traceprocessing entities 206 will be increased, while if a load is beneath aminimum threshold, the number of trace processing entities 206 will bedecreased. Hysteresis over a time frame can be used to limit unnecessaryscaling up or down with short term load changes. The hashing functioncan be adjusted to evenly distribute the trace segments 433 to the newquantity of trace processing entities 206. Thereafter, the operation ofthe portion of the load balancer 203 ends.

With reference to FIG. 12 , shown is a schematic block diagram of thecomputing environment 103 according to an embodiment of the presentdisclosure. The computing environment 103 includes one or more computingdevices 1200. Each computing device 1200 includes at least one processorcircuit, for example, having a processor 1203 and a memory 1206, both ofwhich are coupled to a local interface 1209. To this end, each computingdevice 1200 may comprise, for example, at least one server computer orlike device. The local interface 1209 may comprise, for example, a databus with an accompanying address/control bus or other bus structure ascan be appreciated.

Stored in the memory 1206 are both data and several components that areexecutable by the processor 1203. In particular, stored in the memory1206 and executable by the processor 1203 are a storage service 118, acode execution service 121, a queue service 124, a trace processingsystem 127, applications 115, and potentially other applications. Alsostored in the memory 1206 may be a data store 112 and other data. Inaddition, an operating system may be stored in the memory 1206 andexecutable by the processor 1203.

It is understood that there may be other applications that are stored inthe memory 1206 and are executable by the processor 1203 as can beappreciated. Where any component discussed herein is implemented in theform of software, any one of a number of programming languages may beemployed such as, for example, C, C++, C#, Objective C, Java®,JavaScript®, Perl, PHP, Visual Basic®, Python®, Ruby, Flash®, or otherprogramming languages.

A number of software components are stored in the memory 1206 and areexecutable by the processor 1203. In this respect, the term “executable”means a program file that is in a form that can ultimately be run by theprocessor 1203. Examples of executable programs may be, for example, acompiled program that can be translated into machine code in a formatthat can be loaded into a random access portion of the memory 1206 andrun by the processor 1203, source code that may be expressed in properformat such as object code that is capable of being loaded into a randomaccess portion of the memory 1206 and executed by the processor 1203, orsource code that may be interpreted by another executable program togenerate instructions in a random access portion of the memory 1206 tobe executed by the processor 1203, etc. An executable program may bestored in any portion or component of the memory 1206 including, forexample, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), hard drive,solid-state drive, USB flash drive, memory card, optical disc such ascompact disc (CD) or digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk, magnetictape, or other memory components.

The memory 1206 is defined herein as including both volatile andnonvolatile memory and data storage components. Volatile components arethose that do not retain data values upon loss of power. Nonvolatilecomponents are those that retain data upon a loss of power. Thus, thememory 1206 may comprise, for example, random access memory (RAM),read-only memory (ROM), hard disk drives, solid-state drives, USB flashdrives, memory cards accessed via a memory card reader, floppy disksaccessed via an associated floppy disk drive, optical discs accessed viaan optical disc drive, magnetic tapes accessed via an appropriate tapedrive, and/or other memory components, or a combination of any two ormore of these memory components. In addition, the RAM may comprise, forexample, static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random accessmemory (DRAM), or magnetic random access memory (MRAM) and other suchdevices. The ROM may comprise, for example, a programmable read-onlymemory (PROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), anelectrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), or otherlike memory device.

Also, the processor 1203 may represent multiple processors 1203 and/ormultiple processor cores and the memory 1206 may represent multiplememories 1206 that operate in parallel processing circuits,respectively. In such a case, the local interface 1209 may be anappropriate network that facilitates communication between any two ofthe multiple processors 1203, between any processor 1203 and any of thememories 1206, or between any two of the memories 1206, etc. The localinterface 1209 may comprise additional systems designed to coordinatethis communication, including, for example, performing load balancing.The processor 1203 may be of electrical or of some other availableconstruction.

Although the storage service 118, the code execution service 121, thequeue service 124, the trace processing system 127, the applications115, and other various systems described herein may be embodied insoftware or code executed by general purpose hardware as discussedabove, as an alternative the same may also be embodied in dedicatedhardware or a combination of software/general purpose hardware anddedicated hardware. If embodied in dedicated hardware, each can beimplemented as a circuit or state machine that employs any one of or acombination of a number of technologies. These technologies may include,but are not limited to, discrete logic circuits having logic gates forimplementing various logic functions upon an application of one or moredata signals, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) havingappropriate logic gates, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), orother components, etc. Such technologies are generally well known bythose skilled in the art and, consequently, are not described in detailherein.

The flowcharts of FIGS. 6-11 show the functionality and operation of animplementation of portions of the trace processing system 127 and thesampling service 303. If embodied in software, each block may representa module, segment, or portion of code that comprises programinstructions to implement the specified logical function(s). The programinstructions may be embodied in the form of source code that compriseshuman-readable statements written in a programming language or machinecode that comprises numerical instructions recognizable by a suitableexecution system such as a processor 1203 in a computer system or othersystem. The machine code may be converted from the source code, etc. Ifembodied in hardware, each block may represent a circuit or a number ofinterconnected circuits to implement the specified logical function(s).

Although the flowcharts of FIGS. 6-11 show a specific order ofexecution, it is understood that the order of execution may differ fromthat which is depicted. For example, the order of execution of two ormore blocks may be scrambled relative to the order shown. Also, two ormore blocks shown in succession in FIGS. 6-11 may be executedconcurrently or with partial concurrence. Further, in some embodiments,one or more of the blocks shown in FIGS. 6-11 may be skipped or omitted.In addition, any number of counters, state variables, warningsemaphores, or messages might be added to the logical flow describedherein, for purposes of enhanced utility, accounting, performancemeasurement, or providing troubleshooting aids, etc. It is understoodthat all such variations are within the scope of the present disclosure.

Also, any logic or application described herein, including the storageservice 118, the code execution service 121, the queue service 124, thetrace processing system 127, and the applications 115, that comprisessoftware or code can be embodied in any non-transitory computer-readablemedium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution systemsuch as, for example, a processor 1203 in a computer system or othersystem. In this sense, the logic may comprise, for example, statementsincluding instructions and declarations that can be fetched from thecomputer-readable medium and executed by the instruction executionsystem. In the context of the present disclosure, a “computer-readablemedium” can be any medium that can contain, store, or maintain the logicor application described herein for use by or in connection with theinstruction execution system.

The computer-readable medium can comprise any one of many physical mediasuch as, for example, magnetic, optical, or semiconductor media. Morespecific examples of a suitable computer-readable medium would include,but are not limited to, magnetic tapes, magnetic floppy diskettes,magnetic hard drives, memory cards, solid-state drives, USB flashdrives, or optical discs. Also, the computer-readable medium may be arandom access memory (RAM) including, for example, static random accessmemory (SRAM) and dynamic random access memory (DRAM), or magneticrandom access memory (MRAM). In addition, the computer-readable mediummay be a read-only memory (ROM), a programmable read-only memory (PROM),an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electricallyerasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), or other type of memorydevice.

Further, any logic or application described herein, including thestorage service 118, the code execution service 121, the queue service124, the trace processing system 127, and the applications 115, may beimplemented and structured in a variety of ways. For example, one ormore applications described may be implemented as modules or componentsof a single application. Further, one or more applications describedherein may be executed in shared or separate computing devices or acombination thereof. For example, a plurality of the applicationsdescribed herein may execute in the same computing device 1200, or inmultiple computing devices 1200 in the same computing environment 103.

Disjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, or Z,”unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with thecontext as used in general to present that an item, term, etc., may beeither X, Y, or Z, or any combination thereof (e.g., X, Y, and/or Z).Thus, such disjunctive language is not generally intended to, and shouldnot, imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at leastone of Y, or at least one of Z to each be present.

It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of thepresent disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations setforth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure.Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-describedembodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit andprinciples of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations areintended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure andprotected by the following claims.

Therefore, the following is claimed:
 1. A system, comprising: at leastone server computing device; and at least one application executable inthe at least one server computing device, wherein when executed the atleast one application causes the at least one server computing device toat least: receive a code trace segment generated by one or moreinstructions executed in response to invocation of a plurality ofservice calls, wherein the code trace segment is associated with anapplication request submitted to a particular service application of aplurality of applications hosted in a service-oriented computingenvironment from a client application, wherein the code trace segmentdocuments the plurality of service calls to component services of theparticular service application to respond to the application request,wherein the particular service application and the one or moreinstructions are executed by a same machine instance in theservice-oriented computing environment; select one of a plurality oftrace processing entities that are hosted in the service-orientedcomputing environment; forward the code trace segment to the selectedone of the plurality of trace processing entities-aggregate, in avolatile memory of the one of the plurality of trace processingentities, a plurality of code trace segments that are received within afirst time window to form a code trace; and store the aggregated codetrace segments in a data store indexed by a unique identifier of theapplication request.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected oneof the plurality of trace processing entities is selected to evenlybalance a processing load across the plurality of trace processingentities.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected one of theplurality of trace processing entities is selected based at least inpart on the application request.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein theselected one of the plurality of trace processing entities is selectedbased at least in part by applying a hashing function to a data itemincluded in the code trace segment.
 5. The system of claim 1, whereinwhen executed the at least one application further causes the at leastone server computing device to at least: determine a current resourceload for the plurality of trace processing entities; compare the currentresource load to a threshold; and automatically scale a quantity of theplurality of trace processing entities.
 6. The system of claim 1,wherein when executed the at least one application further causes the atleast one server computing device to at least: receive, by the at leastone server computing device, an additional segment of the code tracecorresponding to an additional call to a component service of theparticular service application; modify, by the at least one servercomputing device, the code trace to incorporate the additional segment;and store, by the at least one server computing device, the modifiedcode trace in the data store indexed by the unique identifier of theapplication request.
 7. A method, comprising: receiving, by at least oneserver computing device, a code trace segment generated by one or moreinstructions executed in response to invocation of a plurality ofservice calls, wherein the code trace segment is associated with anapplication request submitted to a particular service application of aplurality of applications hosted in a service-oriented computingenvironment from a client application, wherein a code trace documentsthe plurality of service calls to a plurality of component services ofthe particular service application to respond to the applicationrequest, wherein the particular service application and the one or moreinstructions are executed by a same machine instance in theservice-oriented computing environment; select, by the at least oneserver computing device, one of a plurality of trace processing entitiesto process the code trace segment; forward, by the at least one servercomputing device, the code trace segment to the one of the plurality oftrace processing entities; aggregate, in a volatile memory of the one ofthe plurality of trace processing entities, a plurality of code tracesegments that are received within a first time window to form the codetrace; and storing, by the at least one server computing device, theaggregated code trace segments in a data store indexed by a uniqueidentifier of the application request.
 8. The method of claim 7, furthercomprising: monitoring, by the at least one server computing device, aresource load associated with the plurality of trace processingentities; and automatically scaling, by the at least one servercomputing device, a number of the plurality of trace processing entitiesbased at least in part on comparing the resource load to a threshold. 9.The method of claim 7, further comprising performing, by the at leastone server computing device, a transformation on the code trace beforestoring the code trace.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein performingthe transformation further comprises compressing, by the at least oneserver computing device, the code trace.
 11. The method of claim 7,wherein the same machine instance in the service-oriented computingenvironment executes at least one of the component services.
 12. Themethod of claim 7, further comprising: receiving, by the at least oneserver computing device, an additional segment of the code tracecorresponding to an additional call to a component service of theparticular service application; modifying, by the at least one servercomputing device, the code trace to incorporate the additional segment;and storing, by the at least one server computing device, the modifiedcode trace in the data store indexed by the unique identifier of theapplication request.
 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the code traceincludes local runtime information.
 14. The method of claim 7, whereinat least two of the plurality of applications are operated by differentcustomers of a plurality of customers of a hosting provider thatoperates the service-oriented computing environment.
 15. The method ofclaim 14, further comprising assessing, by the at least one servercomputing device, a cost to an individual customer of the plurality ofcustomers based at least in part on a volume of code traces storedwithin a time window.
 16. A non-transitory computer-readable mediumembodying a program executable in at least one server computing device,wherein when executed the program causes the at least one servercomputing device to at least: receive a plurality of code trace segmentsgenerated by one or more instructions executed in response to invocationof a plurality of service calls, wherein the plurality of code tracesegments are associated with an application request submitted to aparticular service application of a plurality of applications hosted ina service-oriented computing environment from a client application,wherein the plurality of code trace segments document the plurality ofservice calls to a plurality of component services of the particularservice application to respond to the application request, wherein theparticular service application and the one or more instructions areexecuted by a same machine instance in the service-oriented computingenvironment; forward the plurality of code trace segments to one of aplurality of trace processing entities that are hosted in theservice-oriented computing environment; aggregate, in a volatile memoryof the one of the plurality of trace processing entities, the pluralityof code trace segments that are received within a first time window toform a code trace; and store the aggregated code trace segments in adata store indexed by a unique identifier of the application request.17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, whereinwhen executed the program further causes the at least one servercomputing device to at least generate a latency histogram visuallyrepresenting respective latencies for individual ones of the pluralityof component services, wherein the respective latencies are computed byanalyzing a plurality of code traces for a plurality of applicationrequests received by the particular service application.
 18. Thenon-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein whenexecuted the program further causes the at least one server computingdevice to at least generate an index for the plurality of code tracesegments asynchronously with respect to storing the code trace segments.19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, whereinwhen executed the program further causes the at least one servercomputing device to at least compress the plurality of code tracesegments before storing the code trace segments.
 20. The non-transitorycomputer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein when executed the programfurther causes the at least one server computing device to: receive anadditional segment of the code trace corresponding to an additional callto a component service of the particular service application; modify thecode trace to incorporate the additional segment; and store the modifiedcode trace in the data store indexed by the unique identifier of theapplication request.